
Scrum is dead, isn’t it? I mean the name of the agile framework, Scrum. Many agree. And why would this be? Because Scrum became Scrumbut so many times that whenever anyone mentions Scrum, people who have had bad experiences w/Scrum instantly associate it w/Scrumbut.
I have explained before why this happened: because adopting a bottom-up system is next to impossible in a top-down organisation. So what are we left w/?
A bright future.
Yes, a bright future, indeed, in the long run – at least to those of us who live in democracies. As we can learn from here, it is quite obvious that in non-totalitarian countries there will be a push for democracy alongside the education of knowledge workers. This push will not be limited to the political sphere, because the needs of the people are exactly the same in their work as they are as citizens of a society.
There will be a constant push. And this tidal wave will, eventually, break down the resistance of the management model that is about 100 years old. The more educated the people, the greater their hunger for self-actualisation. And at some point these people – who have seen XP fall and Scrum fail – will end up somewhere where they can change this. The waves of education will slowly but certainly wash away the resistance and there is nothing that can be done about it in non-totalitarian countries. It will be the will of the people, and always, eventually, the people prevail.
So, no matter what Scrum will be called, it will become the norm and this is good. And to me, Scrum is just a name. It is the concept that matters and it’s not going to go anywhere. It is a natural tagalong to the education of knowledge workers.
If you think it’s been tough w/Scrum, relax. It’s never easy for those who want to change the status quo. At least in our times we aren’t burnt at the stake for trying to do so. :-)